View Single Post
03-23-2012, 11:37 AM
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ireland
Posts: 770
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by SnowblindNYR View Post
People keep saying how the Rangers' D-men were bad against the Wings. First it was our first pairing now it's MDZ. But we allowed 27 shots, 1 goal, and Lundqvist didn't need to come close to standing on his head. The Wings were injured, but this is still not the Minnesota Wild we're talking about. Something seems to be missing here. If 3 of our top 4 D-men struggled so badly how did we end up holding them to 1 goal in a game where Lundqvist wasn't a monster or anything.
Keep in mind on this board, anything but a 15-0 win in which they scored on 50% of their shots and went 4/4 on the power play is considered less than a decent game. A good game is a 40-0 win.

mahonistan* is offline   Reply With Quote