View Single Post
Old
03-28-2012, 05:34 PM
  #46
txomisc
Registered User
 
txomisc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 7,366
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frozen Failure View Post
I am not too worried about the top 6 holes. I would rather have holes than a logjam. We have guys to fill those holes... they're just rookies, but they should be able to fill them. Smith, Chiasson, Glennie (if he gets his crap together)... if they don't want to risk giving kids top 6 ice time, you sign a 2/3 guy and let them fill in. But honestly, what do we have to lose by giving Reilly and Chiasson top 6 ice time next year? The guys they are displacing are still in the lineup, still have the opportunity to win back their top 6 ice time... ya know, eh.
Id be all on board with it I just dont think the organization would be too into the idea of two top 6 rookies and I really really really don't want to see Steve Ott get top 6 minutes again.

txomisc is offline   Reply With Quote