Thread: Staal
View Single Post
Old
02-22-2006, 03:16 PM
  #47
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
 
SingnBluesOnBroadway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 30,625
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jagr68NYR94Leetch
Calgary's defense was set though. They didnt need an upgrade because there defense was solid all year and had set guys. The Rangers dont have a set defense because Strudwick could easily become the 7th defenseman if you bring in Staal.

So what if it was set. If there is a better option, you make adjustments.

And the Rangers aren't set defensively? They're tied for second in goals against? The Flames were third in goals against last season.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jagr68NYR94Leetch
Size has to do alot with it. He wont get pushed around in the "big" NHL. I'm less worried that he will get hurt because of some big guy coming over and crushing him because he is a big guy unlike a small foward who could get killed because a big guy who is filled out smashes him.
So Malhotra failed becasue of lack of size? He was about 6'2, 200.

You are ignoring the fact that the game is faster, the players bigger, stronger and smarter. If you're concern is just him gettting hurt, you don't understand what my point is.

__________________
SingnBluesOnBroadway is offline