View Single Post
Old
03-30-2012, 04:21 PM
  #24
broadwayblue
Registered User
 
broadwayblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 16,403
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khelvan View Post
Not to be pedantic, but don't you mean the opposite of "on paper?" That's a phrase normally meant as an evaluation of team potential based on looking at individual player talent. "On paper," the Rangers teams with big names and hired guns were better than the current one. But this team has already proven that in real terms it is far better than they.
Yeah, on paper this is far from a dominating team. It's not even close to the top teams in the league talent wise. However, the reality is that the team has been far greater than the sum of its parts.

broadwayblue is online now   Reply With Quote