View Single Post
03-30-2012, 11:40 PM
New Liskeard
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,812
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by htpwn View Post
Yes, of course, a 27-year-veteran of the highest rated local newscast in Toronto clearly ran the report for "controversy and ratings." Makes a lot of sense.
For sure, the thought process and engaging questions put forth in those interviews were thought provoking and news worthy. A complete and utter joke; nothing more. Hack jouranlism at its finest. Clearly shows how programs like Springer and others have strived, and some, appreciate non sensical controversy, and lack of inteligence and thought behind it.

New Liskeard is offline   Reply With Quote