View Single Post
04-03-2012, 11:12 AM
Smartest in the Room
KINGS17's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 18,139
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Asheru View Post
Count me as one.

It's not an anti-Quick position. I don't agree with giving any goaltender that, just looking at the way other teams are structured. Most of the monster contracts for goalies wind up being headaches at some point. Nashville was in a tight spot with Rinne, but I hate them for doing it.

He's having a great year behind a strong defensive club. He has been able to grow into the job and he's fantastic. I just don't like $7M.
I agree with this. I would be leary of giving any goalie a Rinne-like contract, and that isn't being anti-Quick at all.

KINGS17 is offline   Reply With Quote