Some ?'s answered this morning
View Single Post
04-04-2012, 10:57 PM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Originally Posted by
I just find it extremely crazy we went from majority of the board (at least 75%) saying "wilson has been probably our most consistent forward and will be a stud"... to ... "he lacks detail to his game, he needs improve away from the puck, immature, ect".. sorry but that don't add up imo.
I think maybe him and trotz got into it? who knows but I don't think wilson belongs on the 4th line (just not a fit) .. and if trotz cant justify him being on the 3rd line then I guess its a scratch again...
anyone else want to see a 2nd line of wilson - legwand - rads ?
erat fisher sk
wilson legwand radulov
hornqvist spaling ak
bourque/tootoo/smith gaustad halischuk/yip
Well said. Trotz said, not enough bodies...this year there were extra bodies if he felt so strongly. Also, in Feb. Trotz, on 3 separate occasions commented on how great the Spaling, Wilson, Tootoo line had played and even referred to Wilson and his detail.
( just saying, when asked by the media why a player is not playing, coaches have to say something.....)
I really find it interesting on how quickly hockey fans will turn on coaches, management, and players.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Fortheloveofthegame