View Single Post
Old
03-02-2006, 09:53 AM
  #9
Kritty
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,355
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birko19
If Lang is gonna be traded the Wings will need another forward to replace him, Langkow in that case could make sense but Calgary does't have to give that much for Lang alone, I think Lang for Langkow is almost fair (I think Lang is better but salary plays a role), maybe if each side adds something on the side just to make it more even.

Here's a better proposal:

Lang+Hudler+2nd.

for

Langkow+Leopold.
I don't see why Calgary does this aside from adding the playmaker they need. Lang and Langkow aren't far off in terms of value, leaving Leopold for Hudler and a 2nd. I think nearly everyone would agree, at least those that know Leopold, that Leopold is worth far more than an undersized player who has proven zero at the NHL level and a very late 2nd rounder. If Leopold goes, it'll be for a young, proven scorer, nothing less.

Kritty is offline