04-08-2012, 10:36 PM
|
#44
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MinneSNOWta
Posts: 6,899
vCash: 500
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Jan Itor
I imagine value is pretty far off. I think Coyle would be very high on their list, and just like the Burns trade doesn't get done without Coyle, I think a Vanek deal would be the same.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zip15
Oh yeah. A lot of what I see in here are lowball offers, but that's the way of the HF world: you have a bad 40 games, you're worthless, not worth your contract, prospects are better than you, etc. I can say with near certainty that any deal not including Coyle would be a non-starter from Regier's perspective. (And I completely understand why Wild fans wouldn't want to trade him, but you have to understand why we wouldn't trade a proven player like Vanek for second-tier prospects.)
|
Bam. What do I win?
|
|
|