View Single Post
Old
04-13-2012, 06:55 AM
  #111
WhiskeySeven
Enlarged Member
 
WhiskeySeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,706
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Saku View Post
I have a question. Is there a self imposed cap for each team? If not then there should be based on real teams salary budgets. I played a similar game on hfboards couple of years ago and we had teams like phoenix spending to the cap which doesnt make sense.
How about something like: teams that are known to have "self-imposed" caps get use up to the maximum their team used the previous season but the league comissioner is in charge of finding out news articles or sources regarding the cap if it's higher or lower than that.

Phoenix shouldn't be spending to the cap, you're right.

Proposition: Instead of one guy as the trade comissioner, we have Hockey Competition Committee, featuring say 3 to 5 GMs. The league commish can't be a part of it either.

They can act as the arbiter over:
any decision that is appealed or argued or has any discrepancy,
NTCs and NMCs and cap abuses [the committee could argue whether a player with a NTC would or wouldn't go to a given team],
kicking players out if they're inactive too often [with the other GMs and the commish],
and so on.

Kinda so we have some strict rules that will enable quick decision making and quick turnaround. The only way this game is successful is if we streamline the heck out of it and not have to wait on ONE person.

Who is doing the simming?

WhiskeySeven is offline   Reply With Quote