View Single Post
04-14-2012, 11:35 AM
Registered User
TheDevilMadeMe's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Country: United States
Posts: 45,634
vCash: 500
The defensemen are definitely closer. I had a Vs2 comparison between Salming and Conacher, and it ended up Conacher had like 721 total and Salming around 675 I think. In a study like that that is biased towards Conacher's era because of competition and league size, the fact that Salming was close to him shows that Salming as the better offensive player. I also adjusted Conacher's adjusted PPG for games played, and he came out to .547 over 900 games, and Salming was at .577 over 1,148 games. Advantage Salming.
I'm not sure I buy this logic.

Also, Eddie Shore would probably be the best PP QB in this series - no idea why he's on a second PP

TheDevilMadeMe is online now   Reply With Quote