Thread: Post-Game Talk: Rangers @ Senators ECQF Game 6
View Single Post
04-23-2012, 09:27 PM
Staals Eye
once TortsKindaGuy
Staals Eye's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 815
vCash: 1187
Originally Posted by nyr2k2 View Post
On the last goal call--I can understand the "inconclusive" ruling. The last shot they showed on the NBCS feed made it look as if Neil kicked over the puck, and that Lundqvist twirling and lunging for the puck is what actually propelled it in.

That actually made sense, since from the first handful of angles we saw it didn't appear conclusive to me that Neil's skate actually contacted the puck. Looked like Lundqvist's stick/glove added the extra propulsion when he went to cover.

I'm always on board with being super critical of the the reffing in the NHL, but I think that call was legitimate. If you asked nyr2k2, impartial hockey fan, whether or not that was conclusive then I'd have to say no. I know I'm in a tiny minority but still.
I said the same thing to my buddy and he told me GTFO.. Then I was right lol. His skate never touches the puck.

Staals Eye is offline   Reply With Quote