View Single Post
04-27-2012, 12:24 PM
Registered User
FlyersMania2's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,549
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Ryker View Post
Bad logic is bad.

On topic, while I don't think Giroux is undeserving of a nomination, I also see nothing wrong with the choice presented. He could easily be there, and if there's anyone I think he could replace, it's Lundquist. But like I said, no terrible injustice has been done by him not being there, either.
He could replace Stamkos...let's be honest. Stamkos is amazing...but does he really make the people around him better? His value to the team is that he scores more than the rest of his team but is he doing the other things?

FlyersMania2 is offline   Reply With Quote