View Single Post
Old
05-03-2012, 11:12 PM
  #138
Bernie Parent 1974
Registered User
 
Bernie Parent 1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Country: United States
Posts: 3,013
vCash: 500
the funniest logic EVER:

Flyers score goal #3: 'Marty saw Bryz's bad goal & decided to match him". Marty can't control the rebound, which is put in. bad goal by Marty

somebody points out Danny's AWFUL line change that led to the game winner by NJ

suddenly, what was a bad goal by Marty, turns into 'Mr. Money in the Playoffs Danny Briere strikes again !!!' & he's the reason we even GOT to OT

now it's a good goal by Danny & not a bad goal by Marty.

we see NJ score when Bryz can't control the rebound, which is put in.

logic says this must, also, be a good goal by Ponikarovsky, since it's the same as Danny's goal ... can't control the rebound, which is put in


but, WAIT !! it's BRYZ !!! it has to be his fault & so it turns into "Bryz needs to control the rebound !!!"

which then should mean that Marty needs to control the rebound.

but, if that's the case, it isn't a good goal by Danny & there's nothing to use as an excuse to cover up for his OT line change .....

so, it must be: a good goal by Danny AND Bryz's fault in OT, even though they both are rebounds .... yea, that's the ticket !!

Bernie Parent 1974 is offline   Reply With Quote