View Single Post
Old
05-04-2012, 02:09 PM
  #94
SJeasy
Registered User
 
SJeasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 12,322
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stickmata View Post
If by 3-5trades/FA's you mean if we added Nash, Malkin, Stamkos, Weber and Quick, we'd be serious SC contenders again, I'm with you. If you mean 3-5 trades/FA's that we can realistically make given our assets/salary cap issues, I'd like some of whatever you're smoking. This team is nowhere close to being a SC contender with just some tweaking, even if Jesus floated down from heaven to coach the team.
And it wouldn't happen the first year, too much turnover. Adapt system to players, etc. I agree with your general principle as turnarounds such as suggested are very rare. The largest odds for the Sharks next year are a very marginal bubble team, barring a miracle or catastrophe. The team assuredly lost ground this year vs a number of opponents.

SJeasy is offline   Reply With Quote