View Single Post
05-06-2012, 05:33 PM
Pietraneglo222's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gatineau
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,271
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Officer Farva View Post
On that list alone, which is comprised of players sorted using a meaningless stat, datsyuk and backes are better then Turris. Add to that pathetic looking list, there are literally dozens upon dozens of better players then 70 point Turris.
Of course they are better right now, I'm talking about a 25 to 30% improved Kyle Turris.

You can **** on my stats if you want and it's easy to do that when you offer no competing analysis but my point is that you can't put the same offensive expectations on Turris that you do on Spezza. They play completely different styles. The end result is that Turris is very strong defensively while Spezza is an offensive leader in this league.

Among the people that play Turris' style and role, 70 points is a wildly inappropriate expectation. 40-55 points for him would be very good if he keeps up his excellent defensive play.

Pietraneglo222 is offline   Reply With Quote