View Single Post
Old
11-24-2003, 04:57 PM
  #20
EquabaleAce
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 662
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to EquabaleAce
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goalie27
The Bruins don't need Poti. If they were willing to pay him $3m/year (or whatever it is he's making), why wouldn't they have paid Berard $2m? Poti sucks defensively, and, although definitely an upgrade, isn't that much better than Berard offensively. The Bruins need a solid two-way defenseman. They don't need someone that's going to be a liability in the defensive end. If the B's look at anyone, they should look at Gonchar.


And I wouldn't give either of those packages (1st and prospect; or Rolston) for Poti.
tom poti is from worcester mass. and having another local boy in the lineup would help the bruins pr

but why would they let berrard walk whom is from r.i. or make an offer to bill guerin (i don't think they could afford him anyways)

poti was in slats doghouse last week and mabye a prospect or a high pick would be sufficent for poti

EquabaleAce is offline