Bruins - Jets
View Single Post
05-17-2012, 01:59 PM
You've been TROUBA'D
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Outer Limits.
Originally Posted by
I hear what you are saying in regards to Enstrom, but in your proposal it included Enstrom signing the extension. So in your proposal the Jets are offering Kane and a signed Enstrom, which I think is a lot to give up.
Your 1st proposal that I replied to was Kane, Enstrom, and Klingberg/ Cormier for Marchand, Krejci, and a 1st.
Above it seems you are saying Kane and Enstrom for Marchand, Krejci, Knight, and a 1st.
I wouldn't do the former, but I would be interested in the latter.
Yeah, I guess I was sort of undercutting the value somewhat by giving up an additional asset, but then realized that from the Bruins' side of things they seemed okay with including Knight with the 1st and Marchand for just Kane.
Also just to note that what I meant was if Enstrom was willing to sign an extension with the Bruins, but had no intention of re-signing with the Jets meaning they either move him or he goes to free agency.
From a Bruins' standpoint, I wouldn't trade Krejci if I wasn't guaranteed that Enstrom would re-sign. In cases like that would teams allow other teams to talk to the player or does that break some rule?
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by untouchable21