View Single Post
Old
05-17-2012, 09:53 PM
  #4
GaryU
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Schaumburg,Il
Posts: 3,221
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 54roughing View Post
considering how he played this year im certain they would, though I dont understand your interest. Chicago surely regrets matching that offersheet since his play has slipped markedly from what it was 2 seasons ago, a borderline 1st and a prospect is a hefty price to pay for someone like Hjalmarsson.

Some blackhawk fans would dearly love to be rid of his salary, he's not a strict cap dump mind you but he's definitely over compensated for how he plays, Id say a 3rd is fair for taking his contract and youd have to play him with Streit since he is horrid with the puck, We would love seeing him with the puck against us Tyutin and Wiz gave him fits

it was funny, he was almost a guaranteed turnover machine
Obviously, playing the absolutely non-aggressive D that Q has play, has to do with the lousy play of the D...Nothing wrong with Hammer that wouldn't be solved by playing a Big Boy D, instead of the 'butt out in back, stick out in front' crap the Hawks are playing...and let's not forget, outside of a short time pairing with Seabrook, Hammer's been covering for Leddy, Lepisto, O'D, Olsen...

GaryU is offline   Reply With Quote