FINAL: Where does Nash end up?
View Single Post
05-23-2012, 04:48 PM
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Originally Posted by
So wait... Let me get this straight...
- Pavelski benefits from playing with Thornton and is why he has so many points
- Pavelski doesn't see top competition because he doesn't play with Thornton...?
Either he plays with Thornton or he doesn't. You can't have it both ways. If he plays with JT he does so on the 1st line, if he doesn't then he's not benefiting from JT's playmaking. It' can't be both.
Sorry to jump in here but I liked how you twisted the post you quoted.... He/She did not say Pavelski "Plays with" Thornton. He said Thornton played against top pairing d-men therefore minimizing the time Pavelski played against them (indicating separate lines but obviously playing on the same team - ie. plays with). You absolutely can have it both ways. It was never mentioned that Pavs was the benficiary (at least in the post you quoted) of Thornton's playmaking.
Just wanted that to be clear. Maybe I missed something along the way for which I apologize but this was clearly a twisted post.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Xoggz22