View Single Post
Old
05-26-2012, 01:48 AM
  #51
hohosaregood
Drunken Snacking
 
hohosaregood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,984
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
You know what Nash will also have to deal with? Not getting to take 300 shots a year because unlike the Blue Jackets, the Sharks have many other goalscorers that need the puck as well. Even within the team this season, you can see the dynamics shifting. Putting Pavelski on the top line takes shots away from Marleau, when Pavs could produce the same amount of shots on the 3rd line.
I don't really see why Nash couldn't get 300 shots, I mean Pavelski got 270 on Thornton's wing and Marleau didn't suffer that badly in his shot totals. Also I can't understand the point of "other goalscorers that NEED the puck as well". With more viable goalscorers then we have more options that could get a shot to the net instead of bottlenecking our options around a few goalscorers

hohosaregood is offline