View Single Post
Old
05-26-2012, 09:36 AM
  #56
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 17,605
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Le Rosbeef View Post
I'm in the group that would be happy to see Nash in SJ.

The current crop can be protected but the truth is, it's still not working and offense was a big issue this postseason. Is he the answer? I don't know. Is he worth the risk? I believe so, given the alternatives. I don't want to see the team stand still and hope it works out, whether that's impatient or not. When Nash is "on", CBS wouldn't even think twice of trading him.
If system changes are not made I fully expect to have the exact same problems next season with or without Nash. The quality of our top-6 was not the issue, the way they were told to play was.

hockeyball is offline