View Single Post
Old
05-30-2012, 02:32 PM
  #44
rockinghockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,142
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DousedInOil View Post
I agree that Gagner isn't the perfect number 2 center on this team but we don't have anyone in the system that is capable of replacing his icetime. I don't want Horcoff as our 2nd line center. That means if RNH goes down he's our top center. Yikes!

I'd rather keep Gagner until we can get another center.

Hall-Gagner-Eberle
Hemsky-Gagner-Yakupov

That's a pretty good top 6. We just need more grit in the bottom 6. Smyth and Horcoff are good leaders but haven't earned a name from playing physical.

Maybe we can move Gagner for a bigger number 2 once Pitlick and Lander are further along?

Going into the season I would be ok with this. Give Gagner a chance with some legit players. Hell if he racks up 60 points his trade value just went through the roof.

With these top 6 I would honestly say that we have secondary scoring.

Just realized you showed two different lines with Gagner. So, adding in RNH would look good.

rockinghockey is offline