Holzer over Schenn
View Single Post
06-01-2012, 05:44 PM
Join Date: Feb 2002
Originally Posted by
Schenn was compared to Adam Foote, right? Anyone know how Adam Foote looked at 22? Not the "Adam Foote" you came to know.
Giving up on a defensive D-man at 22 who's led all D-Men in hits the last 2 years is laughable.
That's a fairly poor argument. For one thing, comparisons made in juniors are meaningless. Gilbert Brule was compared to Mark Messier, wasn't he?
Also, Foote wasn't a prospect that came with top five pick fanfare, and he did have to ply his trade the more traditional route as opposed to being handed a job in the NHL, (which is probably what Schenn should have done in the first place).
Not to mention the fact that Foote was a pretty snarly competitor, while Schenn often looks overwhelmed out there on any given shift, and his hits are completely ineffective in even stopping a puck carrier from going to the net.
What I can tell you is that with four years of NHL experience, Foote was already on the cusp of winning a Stanley Cup, and that was at 24-25. Schenn on the other hand, is playing worse than he did as a rookie.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Stephen