View Single Post
06-04-2012, 03:57 PM
Bleed Ranger Blue
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 16,302
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by NikC View Post
no i think he's saying one has an element the other doesn't have and our team definitely does not have. Parise and Radulov would be the plan imo.
And that "element" seems to be being able to dangle, which sends a tingle up some people's legs, apparently. When compared to a great player like Parise, whatever offensive benefits Radulov may have (which isnt much) is more than negated by the fact he has next to zero interest regarding anything on the defensive side of the puck.

The only reason Id be interested is because Radulov would come at half the price with many less years, which makes sense because hes half the player Parise is.

But to frame this argument in the sense that Radulov would be a better fit on this team, financials aside, than Parise? Thats just silly.

Bleed Ranger Blue is offline