View Single Post
06-10-2012, 06:01 PM
Join Date: Mar 2012
As been said before, Pavs value is in potential and he could be replaced easily shortterm-wise, if something was to happen, but I'm doubtful that something actually does.
Also stated, it is most likely for either (or both) lockout backup plan or contractual leverage. Most pending FA's do this because unless you entertain all possibilities you may not get the best deal for yourself. I'm sure these two reasons were the same we heard about Burmi earlier in the offseason.
And with the Pasquale thing... I hope to god they don't bring him up for a while. He needs some longterm fulltime work in the AHL.
Last edited by garret9: 06-10-2012 at
. Reason: can't spell pasquale apparently
View Public Profile
Visit garret9's homepage!
Find More Posts by garret9