View Single Post
06-15-2012, 07:43 PM
TheJuxtaposer's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 26,945
vCash: 1379
Originally Posted by CloweForbidzYou View Post
no if we get nash i dont see pavelski ever getting 30 again, its awfully hard to score on columbus

lets say we get nash, without trading pavelski, pavelski becomes our #3 center. if he pots 20-25, and Nash gets 35, call me bad at math, but is that not an improvement? handzus/moore/whoever else played 3C, sure as hell didnt combine for 20
I'm talking about the scenario where we trade Marleau+ for Nash. The first line would be Nash-Thornton-Pavelski, and you know which of those guys Thornton is going to be passing too. I don't think Pavelski breaks 20 in that situation.

And besides, with your situation, 30 (Pavelski) + 30 (Marleau) is better than 20 (Pavelski) + 35 (Nash).

TheJuxtaposer is offline