View Single Post
06-17-2012, 02:08 PM
Potato Magician
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bridgend,UK
Country: Wales
Posts: 8,653
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Rainbow Express View Post
I don't want him gone because of the Devils series.

I want him gone because he's 40+ and his 3 million could go towards areas of actual need. Jagr was fun to watch and a very pleasant surprise, but I don't want him getting minutes of our younger guys that needs to get the minutes in order to move along in their development.

If we don't have plans to add any additional forwards, then by all means keep Jagr because he is a solid stop gap until next off season or a trade comes along. However, if we make the push for Nash then I would not consider putting pen to paper with Jagr until Nash is for sure not coming.
What do you feel is better for the development of younger players.

Jagr being on the team, doing his crazy ass training in the middle of the night, while also being a top 10 player of all time.

Not having Jagr and allowing players a little more ice time to further along their development.

Honest question.

Spongolium* is offline   Reply With Quote