View Single Post
Old
06-18-2012, 03:07 PM
  #89
SJeasy
Registered User
 
SJeasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 12,246
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CloweForbidzYou View Post
its not we are undervaluing pavelski, its that your undervaluing kane.

kane is fast, physical and has a snapper most would kill for. he should be a 35-35 player for his career, with the potential for 40+. these players dont grow on trees, and hes only 22.

pavelski while a great center, doesnt get kane himself. our 1sts are usually late picks, so its likely it would be pavs+1st+something else.
You are giving the high points for Kane. Not the deficits (defense). Include defensive play and Kane/Pavs is very uneven in terms of team effect, definite edge to Pavs. The closer comp is Couture and I would give Kane an infinitesimal edge on Couture. I do agree that players like E. Kane are rare.

When considering Pavs in trade, his faceoffs, PK and general defensive play are elite at a very reasonable contract. The slowdown offense of the Sharks absolutely requires faceoffs and no one does it better than Pavs. You can't buy plugs to cover the issue.

SJeasy is offline