View Single Post
06-19-2012, 03:29 PM
Join Date: Feb 2012
Originally Posted by
That isn't what I said. I did not put a price on a star player. I simply am reiterating that Staal, while a good player who I would like to have on my team, is not going to fetch a premium price. You are likely going to get quantity for quality type offers for him. Meaning you won't get back a player that has the same value, but you will be able to get back som players that can plug holes.
Omark is a high risk, high reward type player. Maybe EDM have to add a bit to sweetn the pot to make it an easier pill to swallow.
What about this tweak:
Belanger (solid third line defensive center)
TO 3rd round pick
So in order to balance the fact that Pittsburgh gets absolutely nothing they need out of this deal, you'd add a player who can backfill Staal badly for a year at most and call it even.
Iow, you're proposing
-old, beaten down 4th line grinder
-guy who can't crack the line-up on the league's worst team for the second year in a row
-defensive prospect Pittsburgh doesn't need
-60-65 point defense-first center who happens to be 23 years old, 6'6 and mobile.
You don't see the problem here?
Edit: In essence, here's what you're offering in reverse
To Edm: Tangradi, Adams, Harrington
To Pitt: Hall
Last edited by billybudd: 06-19-2012 at
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by billybudd