Quote:
Originally Posted by VanSciver
Your hung on the mistaken belief that if something can be done, that means it easy to do. That is a false belief on your part.
|
No. You are hung up on thinking, and incorrectly implying, that because I think Carle is easily replaceable, everything else that can be done, is easy as well.
The only thing I've ever said is easy, which I then realized is even
easier than I first thought, is replacing Carle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VanSciver
Nothing to do with semantics. It has to do with your words and your statement that players like Carle are easily replaced. That is incorrect. It is not easy. Here are your exact words that I replied to. Man up to the statement you made, and don't dance around it.
http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh...126839&page=37
"I won't say guys like him grow on trees, but they become expendable and are easily replaced via FA most years or via trade most of the time." |
Correct, I said it. I'll say it again too. Guys like Matt Carle are easily replaced.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VanSciver
And your right Holmgren isn't having sleepless nights over having to replace Carle. Because of right now, the plan is to re-sign Carle.
|
Homer
thinks a deal could get done. You and I have no idea what the actual plan is. It's foolish to think it couldn't have changed, or might change again, especially in the week leading up to the draft unless you believe his plan is already finalized and etched in stone.