Thread: Proposal: Edm-pit-tor
View Single Post
Old
06-24-2012, 03:24 PM
  #35
Celleyna
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 32
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by billybudd View Post
So in order to balance the fact that Pittsburgh gets absolutely nothing they need out of this deal, you'd add a player who can backfill Staal badly for a year at most and call it even.

Iow, you're proposing

To Pitt:
-old, beaten down 4th line grinder
-guy who can't crack the line-up on the league's worst team for the second year in a row
-defensive prospect Pittsburgh doesn't need

to Edmonton:
-60-65 point defense-first center who happens to be 23 years old, 6'6 and mobile.

You don't see the problem here?

Edit: In essence, here's what you're offering in reverse

To Edm: Tangradi, Adams, Harrington

To Pitt: Hall

Sorry for the bump, but given pittsburghs return, I wonder if opinions of this proposal have changed.

Edited for typo

Celleyna is offline   Reply With Quote