Sens Board Prospect Rankings 2012 (1st)
View Single Post
06-25-2012, 04:25 PM
Join Date: Feb 2002
Some interesting arguments re Silfverberg. On one hand, we have several players ahead of where Silfverberg was at teh same age, but then on the other hand, Silfverberg developed so much between the ages of 19 and 21, it's hard to compare him as a 19 year old, because his development was meteoric after that, and we can hardly expect Zibanejad, Stone or Noesen to develop like that over the next two years.
I still think Silfverberg is higher risk than either Noesen or Zibanejad (Stone too). But I think Stone and Silvferberg might have better offensive potential, in particular as goal scorers (although all four have top line potential IMO).
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Dr.Sens(e)