*OFFICIAL* Sudbury Wolves 2012-13 Season Thread
View Single Post
06-25-2012, 08:57 PM
Join Date: Dec 2009
Originally Posted by
But why is that? London had 6, Guelph had 5 or so, etc. Is the way they get played, is it the way they are developed, not sure why.
Well first off, look at the 94's on the roster and compare them to the other teams, simply put, they are much better players, and better players before they ever came to Sudbury.
Take a look at my post in the 2010 OHL Draft, look at my comments on the Wolves draft. Very poor selections outside of the first round.
Way to much focus on northern area kids, and not enough drafing of the 'best player available'. At the time, they seemed to care more about drafting the best local kid, not the best kid. I made the statement that the 94 class would be a poor one of the Wolves. It's proving to be true.
Last edited by Tigers1992: 06-25-2012 at
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Tigers1992