View Single Post
Old
06-26-2012, 03:17 PM
  #79
LatvianTwist
Global Moderator
 
LatvianTwist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas A&M
Country: Estonia
Posts: 21,106
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeaverSports View Post
I propose they spend it on another player, possibly one who is in a similar boat with another organization, whom they believe might actually develop into a player for them or perhaps they buy a few promising AHL players for less and put the balance into improving the scouting department. Maybe they upgrade the practice facilities, or add amenities on the team's charter plane.

While you may not get a lot of NHL-ready talent for $900,000 and it likely won't be a make or break cap number though if the CBA changes, it may be a contract you don't want to be holding that money can buy a lot of real-world benefit spent in other areas.
I can't tell if you're serious or not.

Players have made far more in the AHL before. And considering we'll be nowhere near the cap ceiling, 900K for a year should be absolutely no issue at all. If you want "other assets" just add another 900K, not take it away from another player. Why can't we have both?

LatvianTwist is offline   Reply With Quote