View Single Post
Old
06-26-2012, 08:41 PM
  #429
HighLifeMan
HFB Partner
 
HighLifeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,156
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by smackdaddy View Post
This just sounds like a cult-ish response. If you really cannot be objective about your team for even a second to realize that this guy will more than likely never crack the line up, has a very high risk of being a bust due to the amount of competition he still has to graduate from, and that maybe your team did draft by need, I feel bad for you bro.

Just because it's your favorite team doesn't mean you have to like everything they do.
, Why do you feel obliged to give your opinion (in a negavtive light) on a player in which you have absolutely no information or knowledge on? You draw the conclusion that he will never be an NHL player based on the level of the competition he faced? Talk about being shortsighted.

If Calgary was drafting by need they would have selected a player that could contribute much sooner. What you view as the BPA is completely up to the parameters you set. Calgary obviously selected Jankowski because they believe he will be better then anyone who was available at #14. There is absolutely no substance to your claim that Calgary drafted specifically for a need.

I also think it is remarkable that you hear that Jankowski was such a reach at 21 based strictly on CSS or TSN rankings. Just look at the draft, it was extremely unpredictable and many players did not come close to going where they were projected by "experts".

Some examples include;
Mitchell Moroz - Selected 32nd overall - CSS Ranking #72
Coda Gordan - Selected 165th overall - CSS Ranking #61
Max Iafrate - Undrafted - CSS Ranking #70
Nick Ebert - Selected 211th overall - CSS Ranking #96
Matthew Deblouw - Selected 186th overall - CSS Ranking #51
Slater Koekkoek - Selected 10th overall - CSS Ranking #23

HighLifeMan is offline   Reply With Quote