View Single Post
06-27-2012, 05:12 PM
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 363
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd View Post
How would putting Clowe on the third line be any different from putting Pavelski there in terms of 'rewarding proven players' or 'he's top six here or elsewhere' spiel?
Because I view Pavs as a much better player than Clowe (Clowe is still really good). I don't believe in the 'reward' logic, just that playing Pavs 3rd line minutes would be a major waste for a player of his talent.

This also lines up with my belief that if Tmac is going to continue to go 'Power vs. Power', then our 3rd line should be designed to score a bunch of goals against opponents 3rd and 4th lines. While Pavs could do that, I believe he is best suited to play his strong two-way game against opponents best players.

Falco5 is offline