Roy and Adam for Ott
View Single Post
06-27-2012, 05:19 PM
Win jack for Jack!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Originally Posted by
On this team, Roy definitely is a 1A/1B. He had an off year last year, but he is still a very talented player.
If you get rid of him, it needs to be part of a package for something equivalent. Adam and a second maybe for Ott, but not Roy.
Also, management may have "tried" to trade Roy, but not succeeded. My guess is that Regier puts his value at a bit higher than you (and others) do. We'll see.
Finally, where did I ever say that Ott didn't help this team? I'd love to have Ott. Just not for Roy straight up.
If thats our thinking then we might as well extend Roy right now.
If Roy isnt part of the future, then get a piece that is and will play a big role for you, Ott would. Holding onto Roy makes no sense to me unless you want him to be part of the team, and if you do then give him an extension while his price is low.
I dont want a pick and a weak prospect for Roy, I would rather get a 3rd line center that would give us something we dont have and need.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by SabresAreScaryGood