View Single Post
Old
06-29-2012, 04:43 PM
  #28
achdumeingute
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,567
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BernieParent View Post
I'd get into a multi-page, multi-quote post war about the semantics of Pronger's salary still reducing the absolute off-season amount (irrespective of 10% overage) that can be spent, but I just don't care enough to start.
I mean semantically yes, we can't spend more than 77 mil and his number counts against that. It "somewhat" limits movement, but without him on LTIR I doubt we would be spending more than 72 this offseason...with him, I'm sure we will spend all 77, and waive Matt walker and others...

achdumeingute is offline   Reply With Quote