View Single Post
Old
07-01-2012, 07:01 PM
  #11
Ducks DVM
Moderator
There is no grunion
 
Ducks DVM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Long Beach, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 19,783
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DogEatDog View Post
Oiler fan here

Based upon all information that is floating around, there were three teams that had they signed Schultz--could have been facing charges
--Nucks, leafs and rangers. All reported contact came via playes on the team or third parties associated with the teams in question. The question is- If the Oilers did--the grade two questions

1) Who
2) what
3) Where
4)How
5) Why
6) When

based upon everything i read and saw--the three afor mention teams where the guys who may have crossed the line. Both Rangers and Leaf players who know Schultz said they had talked to him "but not about joining their team"
Interesting. The rules allow for teams and players to be sanctioned strictly on circumstantial evidence of tampering. And that team doesn't have to be the one that signed him to still get hit with tampering charges. All it requires is offering, it doesn't require an actual contract be signed.

Ducks DVM is offline   Reply With Quote