Sharks no longer interested in Daniel Winnik
View Single Post
07-03-2012, 04:55 PM
Join Date: Oct 2006
Originally Posted by
Yes Burish has been used in the shutdown role very effectively waaayy back in the 2010-2011 season. There is not enough differences between the two to warrant a significant increase in pay to sign Winnik.
In what respect was he effective in the role? He was outmatched in that role that year. And even if you were given that one year, that still means he is unproven in this capacity and has a much richer history of 4th line roles. There is a significant difference between the two because Winnik has shown that he is good for the role for the last couple of years as opposed to not at all.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Pinkfloyd