View Single Post
07-03-2012, 06:14 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 32,585
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by number72 View Post
This part of his argument doesn't stand up:
Somehow we are to believe a $9.5M 2 year contract with a more restrictive NTC for an often injured fragile centre in Connolly is a great deal.
But surprisingly a $9M 2 year contract without restrictions is a bad deal for large equally effective centre is a terrible deal?
Who says Connolly was a great deal?

ACC1224 is offline