View Single Post
Old
07-05-2012, 12:59 PM
  #240
ClemQ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 532
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chsb View Post
It still does not deter his pojnt to be a validone about the "supposed depth" of the Moncton D.
Atleast 4-5 names in there are unknown quantities at the Q level.
tks CHSB....i think they want to argue nuances because they cant argue the fact that they're D is not as deep as they think it is.

ClemQ is offline   Reply With Quote