View Single Post
07-05-2012, 12:59 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 572
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by chsb View Post
It still does not deter his pojnt to be a validone about the "supposed depth" of the Moncton D.
Atleast 4-5 names in there are unknown quantities at the Q level.
tks CHSB....i think they want to argue nuances because they cant argue the fact that they're D is not as deep as they think it is.

ClemQ is offline   Reply With Quote