View Single Post
Old
07-05-2012, 10:10 PM
  #18
Cash for Nash
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,689
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by KallioWeHardlyKnewYe View Post
Re: Tim Erixon's Lunchbox

Thanks for that response. I personally think that your proposal is a fair compromise and one that would generally be accepted amongst CBJ fans (though some may want to squeeze another pick or prospect of some sort)

And you're right - the Rangers prospects aren't third tier. There is a lot of hyperbole getting tossed around on all sides of this discussion.
Yeah...It's fair at least. Damn. Erixson's lunchbox proposed that?

CBJ problem going forward: That's 4 centers now: Brassard, Stepan, Johansen, Dubinsky, and Letestu makes 5. Can any of these guys play wing?

Cash for Nash is offline