Quote:
Originally Posted by broadwayblue
If ALL it cost to have Nash was to pay his 7.8M salary it would be a tough enough call to take him. That's a lot of money for a lot of years for a guy who's very good but not great. When you add to that the fact you have to ALSO give up assets he becomes even more costly. If he scored 10 more goals a year and cost 1M less I'd be much more inclined to pull the trigger...even if it meant giving up Stepan.
|
I understsnd. I'm just saying asking for ONE of them is not an absurd demand. No I don't do it, but I'm of the belief Nash would be a 75-80 pt player here