Thread: Proposal: Colorado-Pheonix
View Single Post
Old
07-06-2012, 06:05 AM
  #27
CobraAcesS
Registered User
 
CobraAcesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Seattle
Country: United States
Posts: 4,644
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan13 View Post
The trade was Burns + 2nd (37th in 2012) for Coyle + Seto + 1st (28th in 2011). Sharks didn't trade a single key piece from their roster. Setoguchi is a decent top 6 winger, Coyle is a potential top 6 forward with top line upside and it was a late 1st.
Didn't Burns only have a year left on his contract as well?

That's not a small return..

We don't have a forward prospect with the clear upside that Coyle does and Seto probably has similar value to Downie I would imagine.

So do you really want to trade one of our forwards for say Enstrom (Who will be 28 in NOV) plus a 1st and our best prospect?

I would rather take a risk on a blue chip prospect than a older defender with one year left on his contract any day. Especially with the price difference.

CobraAcesS is offline   Reply With Quote