View Single Post
07-06-2012, 07:35 PM
Registered User
Lundsanity30's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,541
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by tikkanese10 View Post
I can't imagine us doing too much worse than the year we ended up getting Brendl and Lundmark. Didn't do us much good.

...and yes I said Art Ross regarding Nash. In 2009 he had 79 points with Voracek, Umberger and the mighty Huselius as the other top point getters. He was 40-39-79 with those guys. Is it delusional to think that he could be 45-49-94 with the Rangers? I don't think so.

The award could be won with that many points. St. Louis did it in 2004. Even if the Sedins or sid or some body else get 100+ Nash will still have been in competition for the award. It is not crazy to think this.
Nash just being a 35 40 guy for this team would be HUGE

Lundsanity30 is offline