View Single Post
07-06-2012, 07:58 PM
Registered User
racerjoe's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,041
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by belair View Post
I don't agree with this at all.

So you're saying that keeping Jerome Iginla and Miika Kiprusoff for the remainder of their careers are good moves simply because the Flames are unlikely to get the better end of a deal?

Say these players play three more seasons in Calgary prior to retiring. In those years they bring zero championships to Calgary.

So both retire having not won a single championship in their respective careers and both retire obviously leaving two gaping holes in Calgary's line-up once they are gone.

Do you not think Iginla could've helped the LA Kings this past spring? Or the Bruins the season before? And while you may not have won the deal, you can still say that Jerome Iginla won a Stanley Cup in his career. And you can do so while adding some valuable (albeit less-valuable as he gets closer to retirement) assets in return for his services.

If the playoffs are a faint hope at the deadline every year, Jay Feaster is shooting the Calgary Flames in the foot holding on to his hand and waiting until the next season. That isn't a sign of a good General Manager.
I agree with this. This is kind of what we are looking to do with Luongo. We know we will loose the trade when we do trade him as you always do when you are trading the best player, but we still want assets for him.

racerjoe is offline