Quote:
Originally Posted by monster_bertuzzi
But in those 60 games that guy will be on the ice for 60 minutes, whereas Nasher will be on the ice for 20.
|
Soo you're saying... 60x60 = Luongo will play 3600 mins vs Nash playing... 82x20... 1640 mins. so... Luongo = better?
Quote:
Originally Posted by danishh
nash: 47.4M 6 years 7.8 cap
luongo: 40.28M 6 years 5.333333 cap (last four years of his contract are likely throwaway years)
Luongo is a top 5 goalie. Not sure Nash is a top 10 winger even.
Most teams already have a starting goalie. No teams have 4 top 6 wingers they are happy with.
So...
If you're one of the few teams looking for a starting goalie upgrade, luongo is more valuable to you. Otherwise, it's Nash.
|
This is brilliantly broken down. Everything you say is true.