Free Agent Frenzy (Part VIII): Still no decision with Doan
View Single Post
07-08-2012, 06:40 PM
Join Date: Jun 2010
Originally Posted by
Ignoring the far-fetchedness of everything else, the fact that they signed him is indication they would not have gone for him as an asset. You know why? Because he's not ours to give. He was a UFA. He had an AHL deal with us.
Far fetchedness is in dispute.
IF we owned his rights (or had dibs to sign him), again, my mistake that was not the case but
IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF IF we did, he would have been an attractive player to them in a deal at a certain price. They would never had signed him; he'd already be our property.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by bernmeister